ReviewBiodegradation2025
Advanced integrated Eco-strategies for effective antibiotic waste management.
Review in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic contamination has emerged as a critical environmental challenge due to its persistence, difficulty in removal, and adverse impacts, including gene dissemination, resistance, and ecosystem disruption. Despite their clinical and agricultural benefits, the release of antibiotics into the environment is poorly regulated, leading to growing ecological and public health concerns. Conventional physicochemical methods, including advanced oxidation processes, activated carbon adsorption, and membrane filtration, are highly effective for antibiotic removal but are constrained by high costs associated with energy use, chemical inputs, and membrane replacement. Additionally, techniques such as Fenton reactions (using iron hydroxides with antibiotic residues), coagulation flocculation (binding metal hydroxides to antibiotics), and electrocoagulation (producing electrode corrosion sludge) generate toxic sludge, complicating its disposal. More sustainable approaches, such as bioremediation, biochar-assisted systems, anaerobic and aerobic digestion, biological aerated filters, and microbial fuel cells, demonstrate cost-effectiveness and minimal sludge production. However, both physico-chemical and biological methods still face limitations, emphasising the need for integrated solutions. Hybrid technologies that combine conventional and biological techniques, such as biochar-based bioreactors coupled with membrane separation or advanced oxidation, offer a promising approach for effective remediation. Emerging strategies also highlight the role of novel adsorbent materials (e.g., activated carbon, sawdust) and the application of machine learning in optimising antibiotic waste treatment. Future strategies require coordinated action across healthcare, agriculture, and the pharmaceutical sector, alongside robust risk assessment frameworks that consider both human and environmental health. This review examines current bioremediation strategies, hybrid technologies, and policy measures, underscoring the importance of integrated and sustainable approaches to address antibiotic contamination and resistance genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41284101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.