Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284101›Full record

ReviewBiodegradation2025

Advanced integrated Eco-strategies for effective antibiotic waste management.

Varsha Sharma, Ishfaq Nabi Najar, Anu Radha, Sonali Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Deepika Singh, Sumit G Gandhi, Vinod Kumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Varsha SharmaFermentation and Microbial Biotechnology Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR-IIIM), Jammu, 180001, J&K, India.
Ishfaq Nabi NajarFermentation and Microbial Biotechnology Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR-IIIM), Jammu, 180001, J&K, India.
Anu RadhaFermentation and Microbial Biotechnology Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR-IIIM), Jammu, 180001, J&K, India.
Sonali SharmaFermentation and Microbial Biotechnology Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR-IIIM), Jammu, 180001, J&K, India.
Sunil KumarCSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur, 440020, India.
Deepika SinghAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
Sumit G GandhiAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
Vinod KumarFermentation and Microbial Biotechnology Division, CSIR- Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR-IIIM), Jammu, 180001, J&K, India. vinod.udsc@iiim.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic contamination has emerged as a critical environmental challenge due to its persistence, difficulty in removal, and adverse impacts, including gene dissemination, resistance, and ecosystem disruption. Despite their clinical and agricultural benefits, the release of antibiotics into the environment is poorly regulated, leading to growing ecological and public health concerns. Conventional physicochemical methods, including advanced oxidation processes, activated carbon adsorption, and membrane filtration, are highly effective for antibiotic removal but are constrained by high costs associated with energy use, chemical inputs, and membrane replacement. Additionally, techniques such as Fenton reactions (using iron hydroxides with antibiotic residues), coagulation flocculation (binding metal hydroxides to antibiotics), and electrocoagulation (producing electrode corrosion sludge) generate toxic sludge, complicating its disposal. More sustainable approaches, such as bioremediation, biochar-assisted systems, anaerobic and aerobic digestion, biological aerated filters, and microbial fuel cells, demonstrate cost-effectiveness and minimal sludge production. However, both physico-chemical and biological methods still face limitations, emphasising the need for integrated solutions. Hybrid technologies that combine conventional and biological techniques, such as biochar-based bioreactors coupled with membrane separation or advanced oxidation, offer a promising approach for effective remediation. Emerging strategies also highlight the role of novel adsorbent materials (e.g., activated carbon, sawdust) and the application of machine learning in optimising antibiotic waste treatment. Future strategies require coordinated action across healthcare, agriculture, and the pharmaceutical sector, alongside robust risk assessment frameworks that consider both human and environmental health. This review examines current bioremediation strategies, hybrid technologies, and policy measures, underscoring the importance of integrated and sustainable approaches to address antibiotic contamination and resistance genes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsWaste ManagementBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBioreactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnaerobic digestionAntibioticAntibiotic waste managementAntimicrobial resistance genesBioremediationPolicies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.