Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284081›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025

A scoping review of abdominal wall functional assessment in patients with hernias.

Haiye Shen, Dominic Farris, David L Sanders, Helen Dawes, Sarah E Lamb, John M Findlay

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Basal Tone, Muscle Memory and Denervation: Pathophysiological Foundations of Abdominal Wall Hernia Development and Recovery.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haiye ShenDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Dominic FarrisDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
David L SandersAcademic Department of Abdominal Wall Surgery, North Devon District Hospital, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Barnstaple, EX31 4JB, UK.
Helen DawesNIHR Exeter Biomedical Research Centre, University of Exeter Medical School. St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Sarah E LambNIHR Exeter Biomedical Research Centre, University of Exeter Medical School. St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
John M FindlayDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. j.m.findlay@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5786-4086

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research National Institute for Health and Care Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpairments in abdominal wall function are common in patients with hernias, with negative effects on their quality of life, often requiring surgical repair. Despite advances in repair techniques, there is no consistent standard for assessing abdominal wall function throughout the peri-operative period, limiting comparability between treatments. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and appraise all the available assessments of abdominal wall function reported in the literature, with a focus on the assessment methods and tools used.

objectivesTo identify and review the assessment methods and tools used to measure abdominal wall function. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies investigating abdominal wall function through any type of assessment were included. There was no restriction on the year of publication. SOURCE OF EVIDENCE: A literature search was performed of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases in June 2025. CHARTING

methodsData was extracted independently by two reviewers. Extracted data included assessment tools and functional domains.

results18 studies were included, where the majority (88.9%) of them focused on the assessment of abdominal muscle strength. Other aspects of abdominal wall function, such as trunk mobility, core stability, and postural control, were also reported but less frequently. There was considerable heterogeneity in how and when abdominal wall function was assessed and defined.

conclusionThis scoping review identified substantial variation in assessments of abdominal wall function. The evaluation of abdominal muscle strength remains dominant, but there is inconsistency regarding the tools and tests used, including isokinetic or isometric dynamometers, surface electromyography (sEMG), and clinical tests such as double leg lowering and trunk raising tests, assessed at different postoperative timepoints. No comprehensive or standardized method currently exists to evaluate abdominal wall function across domains and timepoints, underscoring a critical gap in clinical and research practice. Future research needs to develop or modify existing assessment methods to reflect abdominal wall function more holistically.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesAbdominal WallHernia, AbdominalHerniorrhaphyHumansMuscle StrengthQuality of LifeAbdominal wall functionHerniaIncisional herniaStrengthVentral hernia

Identifiers

PMID41284081
PMCPMC12644148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.