Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284028›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Deep learning for non-invasive detection of steatosis and fibrosis in MASLD: a multicenter study with a new fibroscan-labelled ultrasound dataset.

Kartik Bose, Priya Mudgil, Pankaj Gupta, Samonee Ralmilay, Niharika Dutta, Ajay Gulati, Naveen Kalra, Madhumita Premkumar, Sunil Taneja, Nipun Verma and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kartik BosePostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Priya MudgilPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Pankaj GuptaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. pankajgupta959@gmail.com.
Samonee RalmilayPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Niharika DuttaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajay GulatiPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Naveen KalraPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Madhumita PremkumarPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sunil TanejaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Nipun VermaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Arka DePostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajay DusejaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

Science Energy Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India CRG/2021/005698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to develop and validate deep learning models for non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis using conventional B-mode ultrasound images, with Fibroscan-derived measurement as reference standard.

methodsWe utilized a multi-source approach comprising three distinct ultrasound datasets of patients with MASLD: a private clinical dataset (DS1, n = 111 patients, 1131 images), and two subsets from the public BEHSOF repository-Behbood Clinic subset (DS2, n = 95 patients, 1328 images) for training/validation, and Taleghani Hospital subset (DS3, n = 18 patients, 185 images) for external testing. Additionally, we validated on a temporally independent test set (DS4, n = 23 patients, 155 images). Deep learning models, including EfficientNet-B4 and Vision Transformers, were trained to classify steatosis (S0-S1 vs. S2-S3) and fibrosis (F0-F1 vs. F2-F4), respectively, using 5-fold cross-validation. Performance was assessed and compared with expert radiologists.

resultsFor steatosis classification, our models achieved an AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.88) in cross-validation and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.43-0.93) on the external test set. For fibrosis, AUROC reached 0.86 (95% CI: 0.81-0.91) in cross-validation and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00) on the external test set. On the temporally independent test set, performance was better with AUROCs of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.66-0.98) for steatosis and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00) for fibrosis. The AI models consistently outperformed expert radiologists, whose interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58-0.65).

conclusionThis study demonstrates that deep learning models can accurately identify steatosis and fibrosis from ultrasound images across diverse populations and clinical settings.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElasticity Imaging TechniquesFatty LiverImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLiver CirrhosisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUltrasonographyArtificial intelligenceCirrhosisControlled attenuation parameterFibroscanFibrosisLiver biopsyLiver stiffness measurementNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseSteatosisUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.