Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283984›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2026

Implementing generative pretrained transformer models for text recognition tasks in safety data sheets.

Floris Pekel, Gino Kalkman, Erik Lemcke, Robin van Stokkum, Anjoeka Pronk, Lode Godderis, Janne Goossens, Hilde De Raeve, Eddy Coene, Eelco Kuijpers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Floris PekelTNO, Department of Risk Assessment, Prevention, Innovation and Development, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Princetonlaan 6, 3584CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-0622-8012
Gino KalkmanTNO, Department of Risk Assessment, Prevention, Innovation and Development, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Princetonlaan 6, 3584CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Erik LemckeTNO, Department of Risk Assessment, Prevention, Innovation and Development, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Princetonlaan 6, 3584CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Robin van StokkumTNO, Department of Risk Assessment, Prevention, Innovation and Development, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Princetonlaan 6, 3584CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anjoeka PronkTNO, Department of Risk Assessment, Prevention, Innovation and Development, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Princetonlaan 6, 3584CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lode GodderisIDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Knowledge, Information and Research Department, Interleuvenlaan 58, Leuven 3001, Belgium.
Janne GoossensIDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Knowledge, Information and Research Department, Interleuvenlaan 58, Leuven 3001, Belgium.
Hilde De RaeveIDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Knowledge, Information and Research Department, Interleuvenlaan 58, Leuven 3001, Belgium.
Eddy CoeneIDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Knowledge, Information and Research Department, Interleuvenlaan 58, Leuven 3001, Belgium.
Eelco KuijpersTNO, Department of Risk Assessment, Prevention, Innovation and Development, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Princetonlaan 6, 3584CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplaces handling chemicals require an up-to-date and comprehensive assessment of the potential risks for their workforce. Online safety data sheets (SDSs) inventories provide adequate information to perform risk assessments. However, current practices that manually import information from SDSs into the online inventories are time-consuming, leading to delayed or inadequate risk assessments. This study presents a pipeline using large language models (LLMs) to automate the extraction and management of data from SDSs to online chemical inventories. The pipeline achieved an average accuracy of 0.83 in (close to precisely) extracting multiple variables of interest, such as company name, product name, and hazard statements, in comparison to manually extracting these variables. Overall, this pipeline illustrates the ability of LLM tools to automate SDS inventory management and thereby support the possibility to perform up-to-date risk assessments and evaluation tasks on the work floor, ultimately contributing to occupational safety.

Indexed as

Hazardous SubstancesOccupational ExposureHumansOccupational HealthRisk AssessmentWorkplaceHazardous Substanceslarge language modelsoccupational safetysafety data sheetstext extraction

Identifiers

PMID41283984
PMCPMC13017724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.