ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025
Physiological and clinical significance of mean circulatory and mean systemic filling pressure.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07722325 (Venous Return Pressure Gradient Predicts Acute Kidney Injury Onset and Progression), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Venous Return Pressure Gradient Predicts Acute Kidney Injury Onset and Progression
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Energy, flow and pressure in the cardiovascular system: a narrative review of how the circulation works.Anaesthesia · 2026Review
- A predictive model for prudent albumin priming in cardiopulmonary bypass circuits.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A pressure distends blood vessels even when the heart is not beating and there is no blood flow. This is called mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP). We will first discuss why it is physiologically necessary to have this base pressure. Although all pressures in the vasculature are the same when there is no flow, blood volume distributes based on the compliance of the walls in each compartment. The compliance of systemic venous compartment is by far the largest and contain most of the blood volume. When flow starts, volume redistributes among the vascular regions based on the compliance and resistance draining them. Because of it dominates the total compliance, pressure in the systemic venous compartment changes very little; it is called mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP). Under normal hemodynamic conditions, differences between MCFP and MSFP are trivial because venous compliance is so large compared to all other vascular regions. When cardiac function is maximal, MCFP determines the maximum possible cardiac output. MSFP is significant for two reasons. It is the upstream pressure driving blood back to the right heart. Importantly, it also is the downstream pressure for systemic capillary drainage. Thus, a high MSFP increases the risk of tissue edema. From our review of the studies, the pressure difference from MSFP to the right atrium (RAP) is generally in the 3 to 6 mmHg range so that MSFP can be approximated by adding values in this range to properly measured RAP. Ideally, MSFP should be less than 10 mmHg to limit capillary drainage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.