Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283961›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025

Physiological and clinical significance of mean circulatory and mean systemic filling pressure.

Sheldon Magder, Douglas Slobod, Antoine Vieillard-Baron

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07722325 (Venous Return Pressure Gradient Predicts Acute Kidney Injury Onset and Progression), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07722325 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Venous Return Pressure Gradient Predicts Acute Kidney Injury Onset and Progression

TypeobservationalSponsorSichuan Academy of Medical SciencesRan2026 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsAKI - Acute Kidney InjuryArmsNo study intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheldon MagderDepartment of Critical Care, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Monrteal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. sheldon.magder@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8576-0257
Douglas SlobodDepartment of Critical Care, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Monrteal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Antoine Vieillard-BaronDepartment of Critical Care, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Monrteal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pressure distends blood vessels even when the heart is not beating and there is no blood flow. This is called mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP). We will first discuss why it is physiologically necessary to have this base pressure. Although all pressures in the vasculature are the same when there is no flow, blood volume distributes based on the compliance of the walls in each compartment. The compliance of systemic venous compartment is by far the largest and contain most of the blood volume. When flow starts, volume redistributes among the vascular regions based on the compliance and resistance draining them. Because of it dominates the total compliance, pressure in the systemic venous compartment changes very little; it is called mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP). Under normal hemodynamic conditions, differences between MCFP and MSFP are trivial because venous compliance is so large compared to all other vascular regions. When cardiac function is maximal, MCFP determines the maximum possible cardiac output. MSFP is significant for two reasons. It is the upstream pressure driving blood back to the right heart. Importantly, it also is the downstream pressure for systemic capillary drainage. Thus, a high MSFP increases the risk of tissue edema. From our review of the studies, the pressure difference from MSFP to the right atrium (RAP) is generally in the 3 to 6 mmHg range so that MSFP can be approximated by adding values in this range to properly measured RAP. Ideally, MSFP should be less than 10 mmHg to limit capillary drainage.

Indexed as

Blood volumeCapacitanceCapillary pressureCardiac outputComplianceRight atrial pressureVenous resistanceVenous return

Identifiers

PMID41283961
PMCPMC12644377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.