ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Single-cell omics arena: evaluation of large language models for automatic cell-type annotations on single-cell omics data via RNA-seq bridging.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The single-cell sequencing revolution enables simultaneous molecular profiling of various modalities across thousands of individual cells, allowing scientists to investigate the diverse functions of complex tissues. Among all the analysis steps, assigning individual cells to specific types is fundamental for understanding cellular heterogeneity. However, this process is labor-intensive and requires extensive expert knowledge. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to automatically extract biological knowledge, such as marker genes, promoting efficient, and automated cell-type annotations. To evaluate the capability of modern LLMs in automating the cell-type identification process, we first introduce an automated cell-type annotation method with comprehensive benchmark: Single-cell Omics Arena). Specifically, we began by compiling 11 publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets and evaluating eight LLMs across 1226 cell-type annotation-related tasks. This effort established a foundation for automated cell-type annotation from scRNA-seq data using interpretable features such as gene names. Building upon this benchmark, we introduced domain-specific chain-of-thought prompting techniques to enhance the accuracy of cell-type annotation and facilitate the extraction of relevant biological insights. Finally, to accommodate non-interpretable features, we proposed to leverage a pretrained VAE-based cross-modality translation module to convert features such as epigenetic marks into interpretable representations, which enables the seamless extension of LLM-based cell-type annotation to non-RNA-based sequencing technologies. In summary, our benchmark provides key insights into automated cell-type annotation from scRNA-seq data and demonstrates the potential of cross-modality translation for handling non-interpretable features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.