ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
The influence of uncertainty about ear of presentation, gender, and linguistic structure in following streams of speech.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of listeners to attend to speech streams was studied for conditions in which low-level acoustic cues (talker gender and ear of presentation) and high-level context cues (uncertainty and linguistic structure) were varied, to better understand how these factors interact when reinforcing or competing with one another. In experiment 1, two sentences spoken by two different-gender talkers were presented simultaneously to separate ears. Listeners were instructed to report the sentence according to talker gender or ear. As the sequence of words progressed in a trial, the talkers either switched unpredictably between ears (creating uncertainty) or remained fixed. Results showed that switches between ears degraded intelligibility, but the benefits of syntactic structure remained. In experiment 2, a single stream of speech was presented in which the talker gender and ear of presentation could unpredictably switch on each word. Listeners reported a subset of the words according to talker gender or ear, with target and non-target words together forming a syntactic sentence or with non-target words syntactically anomalous. More non-target word confusions were found for syntactic sentences, likely due to the binding effect of syntax. Overall, the findings emphasized the importance of both low-level and high-level predictability for speech identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.