Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283574›Full record

ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Birefringence of the Human Cornea: A Review.

Sudi Patel, Larysa Tutchenko, Igor Dmytruk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sudi PatelDepartment of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, University Eye Clinic Svjetlost, Heinzelova 39, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Larysa TutchenkoDepartment of Corneal Pathology, Ophthalmic Oncology and Oculoplasty, Kyiv Clinical Ophthalmology Hospital Eye Microsurgery Center, Liubomyra Huzara Ave. 3, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Igor DmytrukDepartment of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Hlushkova Ave. 4, 03127 Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-9482-8746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper aims to provide an overview of corneal birefringence (CB), systematize the knowledge and current understanding of CB, and identify difficulties associated with introducing CB into mainstream clinical practice.

methodsLiterature reviews were conducted, seeking articles focused on CB published between the early 19th century and the present time. Secondary-level searches were made examining relevant publications referred to in primary-level publications, ranging back to the early 17th century. The key search words were "corneal birefringence" and "non-invasive measurements".

resultsCB was first recorded by Brewster in 1815. Orthogonally polarized rays travel at different speeds through the cornea, creating a slow axis and a fast axis. The slow axis aligns with the pattern of most corneal stromal collagen fibrils. In vivo, it is oriented along the superior temporal-inferior nasal direction at an angle of about 25° (with an approximate range of -54° to 90°) from the horizontal. CB has been reported to (i) influence the estimation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness; (ii) be affected by corneal interventions; (iii) be altered in keratoconus; (iv) vary along the depth of the cornea; and (v) be affected by intra-ocular pressure.

conclusionsUnder precisely controlled conditions, capturing the CB pattern is the first step in a non-destructive process used to model the ultra-fine structure of the individual cornea, and changes thereof, in vivo.

Indexed as

birefringencecorneaOCTpolarizationrefractive indexretinal nerve fiber layer

Identifiers

PMID41283574
PMCPMC12641804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.