ReviewAudiology research2025
Management of Facial Paralysis Following Skull Base Surgery: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.
Review in Audiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sexual function and activity in young adults with a primary brain tumor-A population-based longitudinal study.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFacial paralysis is a devastating yet frequent complication of skull base surgery, significantly impacting quality of life through functional impairments and psychosocial consequences. Management is complex and requires an individualized approach based on duration of paralysis, etiology and extent of nerve injury, overall prognosis, and rehabilitative goals. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies for managing post-skull base surgery facial paralysis.
methodsA narrative review of the literature was performed, analyzing surgical reanimation techniques (nerve grafting, nerve transfers, regional and free muscle transfers), static procedures for facial symmetry and ocular protection, and non-surgical interventions such as physical therapy, botulinum toxin injections, and psychological support. Key criteria guiding treatment selection, including muscle viability and timing since injury, were examined.
resultsDynamic surgical approaches remain central to restoring movement. Nerve grafting and transfers are effective when viable musculature is present, whereas regional or free muscle transfers are required in long-standing paralysis with irreversible atrophy. Static procedures provide adjunctive improvements in resting symmetry and eye protection. Non-surgical strategies, including rehabilitation therapy and botulinum toxin, enhance functional outcomes and reduce synkinesis. Psychological counseling addresses the profound emotional burden associated with facial disfigurement. Across modalities, individualized treatment planning is crucial.
conclusionsManagement of facial paralysis after skull base surgery demands a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach. Combining surgical and non-surgical interventions optimizes functional and aesthetic outcomes, helping restore both facial movement and psychosocial well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.