ReviewJournal of xenobiotics2025
Treatment of Xenobiotic Cyclic Nitramine Explosives in Wastewater.
Review in Journal of xenobiotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Degradation dynamics: an insight into microbial interactions with explosive compounds.Biodegradation · 2026Review
- Rabbit Litter-Derived Carbon Materials for Organophosphate Pesticide Mitigation: Adsorption Performance, Neurotoxicity Reduction, and Genotoxicity Assessment.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cyclic nitramine explosives such as octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX), hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), and 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20) are xenobiotics that are utilized in a variety of propellants and traditional weapons. The primary source of water contamination is the industrial use of these hazardous substances in propellants and wastewater generated from munitions production facilities. These chemicals have a negative impact on human health and ecosystems. It is necessary to remove these toxic compounds from the environment safely because their production and usage have seriously contaminated soil and groundwater. Although there are no widely adopted WHO or US federal Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for military explosives, the health advisory limits for RDX in drinking water are 2 µg/L, and for HMX are 400 µg/L. Numerous traditional treatment approaches that incorporate physical, biological, and chemical processes have been used to decontaminate explosive wastewater. However, contaminants are not completely mineralized by these methods. Complete reduction of these chemicals can be accomplished by combining suitable methods. For the remediation of explosive effluent, integrated treatment systems that combine the effectiveness of biological and physical-chemical methods have shown promising results. This review discusses the toxicity and some physical-chemical-biological and combined treatment processes of wastewater polluted by these explosive contaminants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.