Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283407›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2025

Eye-Tracking Data in the Exploration of Students' Engagement with Representations in Mathematics: Areas of Interest (AOIs) as Methodological and Conceptual Challenges.

Mahboubeh Nedaei, Roger Säljö, Shaista Kanwal, Simon Goodchild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahboubeh NedaeiDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.
Roger SäljöDepartment of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Shaista KanwalDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.
Simon GoodchildDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.

Funding

University of Agder 010720-300623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mathematics, and in learning mathematics, representations (texts, formulae, and figures) play a vital role. Eye-tracking is a promising approach for studying how representations are attended to in the context of mathematics learning. The focus of the research reported here is on the methodological and conceptual challenges that arise when analysing students' engagement with different kinds of representations using such data. The study critically examines some of these issues through a case study of three engineering students engaging with an instructional document introducing double integrals. This study reports that not only the characteristics of different types of representations affect students' engagement with areas of interests (AOIs), but also methodological decisions, such as how AOIs are defined, will be consequential for interpretations of that engagement. This shows that both technical parameters and the inherent nature of the representations themselves must be considered when defining AOIs and analysing students' engagement with representations. The findings offer practical considerations for designing and analysing eye-tracking studies when students' engagement with different representations is in focus.

Indexed as

area of interesteye-trackingmathematical representationsmathematics learning

Identifiers

PMID41283407
PMCPMC12641983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.