ReviewMethods and protocols2025
Functional Outcomes After Imaging- and Orthopedic Test-Guided Evaluation of Shoulder Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and external validation of a musculoskeletal ultrasound-based prediction model for limited shoulder range of motion in nursing staff with neck-shoulder pain: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Comparison of Different Treatment Strategies for Long Head of Biceps Tendon in Rotator Cuff Repair: A Review.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShoulder soft tissue disorders, such as rotator cuff tears and subacromial impingement, are among the most common causes of musculoskeletal disability. Both physical examination tests and imaging techniques are routinely used in clinical settings; however, their respective contributions to patient outcomes and their potential complementarity remain underexplored.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Controlled clinical studies comparing pre- and post-intervention outcomes in adults with suspected or confirmed shoulder soft tissue pathology were included. Two groups were analyzed: studies using musculoskeletal imaging (ultrasound or MRI) and studies applying orthopedic physical examination tests (e.g., Neer, Hawkins, and Jobe). Functional outcomes were converted into standardized mean differences (SMDs) and synthesized using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I
resultsIn total, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria (
conclusionsImaging was associated with a larger overall clinical effect, while orthopedic tests provided functional insight valuable for screening and monitoring. These findings support the complementary use of both strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning in shoulder care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.