Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283321›Full record

ArticleBiotech (Basel (Switzerland))2025

Exposure to Sulfur Hexafluoride Influences Viability in Cell Transplant Suspensions.

Laura Martínez-Alarcón, Sergio Liarte, Juana M Abellaneda, Juan J Quereda, Livia Mendonça, Antonio Muñoz, Pablo Ramírez, Guillermo Ramis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura Martínez-AlarcónServicio de Cirugía, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7497-6709
Sergio LiarteHealth Sciences Faculty, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM), Av. de los Jerónimos, 135, Guadalupe de Maciascoque, 30107 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1004-4982
Juana M AbellanedaGrupo de Investigación Cría y Salud Animal, Universidad de Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Juan J QueredaDepartamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, 46115 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1105-9505
Livia MendonçaEscola de Vetérinaria, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiánia 74001-970, Brazil.
Antonio MuñozInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), El Palmar, 30120 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0493-7848
Pablo RamírezServicio de Cirugía, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, 30120 Murcia, Spain.
Guillermo RamisInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), El Palmar, 30120 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5580-1612

Funding

Fundación Séneca - Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia 12037/PI/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell transplantation is often performed with ultrasonographic guidance for accurate delivery through injection. In such procedures, using ultrasonographic contrast greatly improves target delivery. However, accumulating evidence suggests that exposure to such contrast agents may have negative effects on transplanted cells. No study so far has researched this issue. Stabilized sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) microbubbles are a widely used sonographic contrast agent. Skin hCD55 porcine transgenic fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow (hMSCs) were exposed in vitro to SF6 in concentrations ranging from 1.54 µM to 308 µM. The effects on viability and cell growth were registered using an impedance-based label-free Real-Time Cell Analyzer (RTCA). Data was recorded every 15 min for 50 h of total study time. Both cell lines behave distinctly when exposed to SF6. Porcine fibroblast growth showed relevant alterations only when exposed to higher concentrations. In contrast, hMSCs showed progressive growth decrease in relation to SF6 concentration. Taken together, while SF6-based contrast agents pose no threat to patient safety, our results indicate that exposure of suspended stem cells to the contrast agent could affect the effective dose administered in cell therapy procedures. This prompts specific cell lineage testing, adjusting methods and properly compensating for cell loss, with a potential impact on procedural cost and success rates.

Indexed as

cell therapycytotoxicityRTCAtransplantationultrasonography contrast

Identifiers

PMID41283321
PMCPMC12641703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.