Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283301›Full record

ArticleNeuroSci2025

Exploratory Behavioral Study of the Production and Processing of French Categorical Liaisons in Children with Expressive DLD.

Elisabeth Cesari, Bernard Laks, Frédéric Isel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroSci, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elisabeth CesariUFR Littérature, Linguistique, Didactique (LLD), Institut de Linguistique et Phonétique Gé-nérales et Appliquées (ILPGA), Université Paris Nanterre, Modyco, 92000 Nanterre, France.
Bernard LaksUFR Littérature, Linguistique, Didactique (LLD), Institut de Linguistique et Phonétique Gé-nérales et Appliquées (ILPGA), Université Paris Nanterre, Modyco, 92000 Nanterre, France.
Frédéric IselLaboratoire de Phonétique et Phonologie, UMR7018, CNRS, UFR Littérature, Linguistique, Didactique (LLD), Institut de Linguistique et Phonétique Générales et Appliquées (ILPGA), Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-4837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Categorical liaison-defined as the obligatory pronunciation of a latent word in the form of a final consonant when followed by a vowel as the initial word or a word beginning with a silent "h" (e.g., des‿ours [dezuʁs])-is a robust phonological phenomenon in French and an informative window into morphophonological development. This exploratory behavioral study investigates the dissociation between perception and production of categorical liaisons among 24 French-speaking children aged 6-10 years diagnosed with expressive Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). A battery of nine ad hoc tasks assessed perception and production across words, pseudowords, noun phrases, and sentences. Results showed that children with DLD performed comparably to typically developing peers in perceiving unrealized categorical liaisons but exhibited significantly more omissions in production, regardless of context or age. Production deficits correlated with reduced working memory and inhibitory control. These preliminary findings provide descriptive data that can inform the development of standardized assessment tools and generate hypotheses about the cognitive mechanisms underlying categorical liaison difficulties in DLD.

Indexed as

categorical liaisonclinical markerexpressive Developmental Language Disorder (DLD)inhibitionneurodevelopmental disordersperceptionproductionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID41283301
PMCPMC12641624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.