ReviewNeuroSci2025
Neuroscience of Behavior.
Review in NeuroSci, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behavior is not a mere sequence of responses to stimuli but the dynamic expression of internal processes such as planning, prediction, valuation, and inference. These functions arise from distributed and metabolically costly neural systems and are best understood by considering behavior and neural activity together. This article presents a narrative and conceptual review of the neuroscience of behavior, integrating biological, environmental, and computational perspectives. We synthesize evidence from motor control, neural population dynamics, predictive processing, and spontaneous behavior, showing that behavior cannot be explained without the neural systems that generate it, and that neural activity gains meaning only through detailed behavioral models. Neural dynamics correlate with latent variables, such as intention and prediction error, that structure adaptive action across timescales. Recent advances in behavioral analysis, dimensionality reduction, and computational modeling enable the analysis of neural and behavioral data with comparable complexity, revealing shared computational architectures that link population activity with the organization of action. Our methodology involved a targeted literature search in PubMed and Web of Science (1919-2025), supplemented by seminal earlier works. By combining mechanistic and functional analysis, we outline a unified framework that explains how brains, bodies, and environments together generate flexible, adaptive behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.