ArticleCase reports in vascular medicine2025
Mycotic Pseudoaneurysms of the Superior Mesenteric and Splenic Artery: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in vascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms are defined as aneurysms of the splenic, superior mesenteric, or inferior mesenteric arteries and their respective branches. Mycotic aneurysms, defined as aneurysms of the arterial wall caused by bacterial or fungal embolization, are a rapidly progressive and often fatal form of arterial aneurysms that can form in the visceral arteries. Aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms of the visceral arteries most commonly present as abdominal pain. The ambiguity with which they often present, paired with their high risk of rupture and hemorrhage, creates a highly precarious situation for clinicians. Failure to identify an aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm of the visceral arteries in time can be a fatal mistake. We present a case of mycotic pseudoaneurysms of the superior mesenteric artery and splenic artery secondary to infective endocarditis managed with open surgical resection, coil embolization, and splenectomy in a 36-year-old male with a history of intravenous drug use. The patient presented with a chief complaint of abdominal pain and confusion. He was admitted for sepsis and work-up of suspected bacteremia and endocarditis. MRI revealed multiple cortical infarcts suggestive of an embolic shower, and transesophageal echocardiogram showed mitral valve vegetations. CT imaging showed an aneurysm of the superior mesenteric artery, later determined to be a pseudoaneurysm. The patient underwent emergent open superior mesenteric artery pseudoaneurysm resection as well as splenectomy due to intraparenchymal pseudoaneurysms and associated necrosis and intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Our case highlights the importance of considering visceral artery aneurysms when formulating a list of differential diagnoses for patients presenting with abdominal pain due to their vague presenting symptoms in conjunction with their potential to rapidly progress to aneurysmal rupture and catastrophic hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.