ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
The impact of social deprivation on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect of Area Deprivation Index on clinical outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social deprivation has previously been shown to have a negative correlation with patients' overall health. In addition, higher levels of social deprivation have been shown to be correlated with poor postoperative outcomes following orthopedic procedures and health-care-related quality of life. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a patient's level of social deprivation level, as measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), affects patients with rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) and their experience with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Methods: A retrospective review, with an evidence level of 3, composed of 119 patients (133 shoulders) with primary RCA who underwent rTSA by a single surgeon at a single institution from 2005-2020. Social deprivation was determined using the patient's ADI score. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, visual analog scale scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scores, Constant-Murley Scores, and Simple Shoulder Test scores were recorded for each patient. Patients were grouped into terciles based on their level of social deprivation and comparisons were made between the groups. Analysis of variance and student t-testing were used to determine statistically significant differences between the groups. Results: Significant functional improvements were observed following rTSA for patients with RCA. Preoperatively, patients from the most deprived group showed lower average Simple Shoulder Test scores (1.62 vs. 3.04, Conclusion: rTSA is a safe and effective procedure for patients from all levels of social deprivation, and patients can experience similar postoperative shoulder pain and function regardless of their socioeconomic status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.