ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Clinical performance of scalable automated p-tau 217 multi-analyte algorithmic blood test with reduced intermediate zone using multiplexed digital immunoassay.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: potential utility in clinical practice.Current opinion in neurology · 2026Review
- Analytical and clinical validation of a high accuracy fully automated digital immunoassay for plasma phospho-Tau 217 for clinical use in detecting amyloid pathology.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Comparison of a multi-analyte algorithmic immunoassay blood test with immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry for the detection of amyloid pathology.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Clinical performance of scalable automated p-tau 217 multi-analyte algorithmic blood test with reduced intermediate zone using multiplexed digital immunoassay.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo address an urgent need for a scalable, accurate blood test for brain amyloid pathology that provides a conclusive result for the greatest number of patients, we developed a multi-analyte algorithmic test combining phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 with four other biomarkers.
methodsMultiplexed digital immunoassays measured p-tau 217, amyloid beta 42/40, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament light chain in 730 symptomatic individuals (training set) to establish an algorithm with cutoffs, and 1082 symptomatic individuals (validation set) from three independent cohorts to identify brain amyloid pathology.
resultsThe algorithmic in validation gave an area under the curve = 0.92, yielding 90% agreement with amyloid positron emission tomography and cerebrospinal fluid. Positive predictive value was 92% at 55% prevalence. The multi-marker algorithm reduced the intermediate zone ≈ 3-fold from 34.4% to 11.9% versus p-tau 217 alone. Diagnostic performance was similar across subgroups. DISCUSSION: The LucentAD Complete multi-analyte blood test demonstrated high clinical validity for brain amyloid pathology detection while substantially reducing inconclusive intermediate results. Highlights: We developed a multi-analyte blood test for assessing brain amyloid status that significantly minimizes the ambiguous "intermediate zone," a key limitation of plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 alone.Our test combines plasma levels of p-tau 217, amyloid beta 42/40 ratio, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and neurofilament light chain for a more comprehensive evaluation of amyloid status.We rigorously validated the test's clinical performance in > 1000 samples from symptomatic individuals across three independent cohorts, using cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography as comparators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.