ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025
An Audit of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Management at a Tertiary Breast Cancer Care Center in India.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with few options for targeted therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is recommended as the first line of therapy in TNBC treatment to improve survival outcomes. The acceptance of NACT in Indian practice is lower than that of global standards. Here, we audit the management of TNBC in a single surgeon unit by evaluating the rate of NACT uptake and its association with survival outcomes. This single institutional audit focuses on the management and outcomes of 165 TNBC patients of Indian origin. Overall, 57% underwent upfront surgery, and 43% received NACT. Early-stage patients showed better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than those diagnosed at late stages. The proportion of patients with NACT was higher among the late-stage patients (70.3%). Most patients, regardless of treatment modality, received breast-conserving surgery. Post-NACT breast conservation consisted of a high percentage of oncoplastic interventions. Late-stage patients who received NACT and achieved a complete pathological response exhibited survival outcomes comparable to those patients diagnosed at early stage. Conversely, patients who did not respond to NACT, i.e., those with residual disease, experienced markedly poorer survival outcomes, underscoring the critical impact of NACT responsiveness on prognosis in advanced-stage TNBC. The stage at diagnosis and response to NACT treatment, if presenting late, are critical prognostic indicators for TNBC patients. Efforts for early diagnosis and wider acceptance of NACT as an option in TNBC treatment in India could lead to better outcomes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-024-02162-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.