ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2025
The Advancing Frontier: Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Pediatric Tumor Management.
Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-Assisted Resection of Mediastinal Tumors in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Robotic-Assisted vs. Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- The Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Robotic Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- AI-driven robotic surgery in oncology: advancing precision, personalization, and patient outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation aims to share our experience with robotic surgery in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of tumor masses in the abdominal or thoracic cavity in children. This illustrative retrospective study, conducted at a single center with the participation of multiple operators, includes pediatric cases operated on between June 2014 and June 2023 for a tumor masses using the Da Vinci Si® surgical robot (Intuitive Surgical®). A total of nine patients, with a median age of 14 years (8-17 years) and a median weight of 57.26 kg (21.5-98 kg), underwent robotic resection of a thoracic mediastinal mass (1 case), an abdominal mass (1 case) or retroperitoneal mass (7 cases). The surgical time ranged from 65 to 433 min, and the tumor size ranged from 18 × 15 × 18 mm to 130 × 145 × 165 mm. Tumor pathologies encompassed a variety of entities, including ganglioneuroma, a paraganglioma, a corticosurrenal adenoma, two mature teratomas, capillary hemangioma of the adrenal gland, epithelial cyst of the spleen, a pheochromocytoma, and a nephroblastoma. Complete excision was achieved in all cases. Intraoperative bleeding occurred but was effectively controlled without the need for conversion. The average hospital stay was 4 days, ranging from 1 to 8 days. All patients were alive at the last follow-up, with no cases of recurrence. In conclusion, robotic surgery has proven to be safe and effective for mass resection in children, particularly for benign cases and in retroperitoneal locations. The benefits of articulated instruments and 3D vision have been especially valuable for precise dissection while maintaining adherence to oncological surgery principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.