ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025
Feasibility and Safety of Pectoralis Major Myocutaneous (PMMC) Flap for Complex Scalp Defect Reconstruction.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a common malignancy of the scalp, and advanced presentation is common in the Indian subcontinent. Scalp tumor excision with reconstruction remains the treatment of choice. The pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap remains a viable option in resource-constrained set up; however, reach over the scalp or above the zygoma remains a concern. Here, we present a case of a 40-year-old female patient where a complex scalp defect was successfully reconstructed with a PMMC flap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.