ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2025
The Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Management of Thyroid Nodule.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and ultrasound-based optimization of post-FNA management decisions in Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Annotating sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the management of thyroid nodules in thyroidology.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the gold standard for evaluating thyroid nodules, which groups thyroid nodules into six categories based on The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Further management will depend upon the category. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USG-FNAC) has revolutionized the sample yield in FNAC. The palpatory method is being used in many developing countries due to the non-availability of suitable ultrasound resources and trained radiologists or surgeons. This paper intends to compare both methods of FNACs with respect to sample yield. This was a 456-patient mixed cohort analysis that included prospectively collected data from 256 patients with USG-FNAC, over 1 year, compared with a historical control of 200 patients who had palpation-guided FNAC(P-FNAC). The influence of the method of FNAC on TBSRTC classification and changes in the surgical intervention were studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to predict the factors that influenced the adequacy of FNAC. The mean age of the study population was 42.6 ± 12.7 years and 75% were women. FNAC was inadequate in 17.5% of the USG-FNAC group and 24.6% of P-FNAC, after excluding cystic nodules. Performing USG-FNAC increased the adequacy of FNA by 7.2% ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-024-02158-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.