Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283067›Full record

ArticleDairy science and management2025

Use of animal-mounted accelerometers to identify positive welfare in dairy cattle.

Holly J Ferguson, Christopher Davison, Joana Lima, Marie J Haskell, Richard J Dewhurst, Craig Michie, Ivan Andonovic, Christos Tachtatzis, Ashley Swan, Mark Brooking and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dairy science and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Holly J FergusonSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1487-7076
Christopher DavisonDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 204 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1XW UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-1791
Joana LimaSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2418-3019
Marie J HaskellSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-0624
Richard J DewhurstSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9357-7372
Craig MichieDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 204 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1XW UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5132-4572
Ivan AndonovicDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 204 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1XW UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9093-5245
Christos TachtatzisDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 204 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1XW UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9150-6805
Ashley SwanFirst Milk, Cirrus House, Glasgow Airport Business Park, Marchburn Drive, Paisley, Scotland, Renfrewshire PA3 2SJ UK.
Mark BrookingFirst Milk, Cirrus House, Glasgow Airport Business Park, Marchburn Drive, Paisley, Scotland, Renfrewshire PA3 2SJ UK.ORCID 0009-0005-8358-5271
Lee TrueloveFirst Milk, Cirrus House, Glasgow Airport Business Park, Marchburn Drive, Paisley, Scotland, Renfrewshire PA3 2SJ UK.
Laura Shewbridge CarterSRUC, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-3074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods for assessing dairy cattle welfare, such as the gold standard Qualitative Behaviour Assessment (QBA), require training and are time consuming in a sector facing labour constraints and staffing shortages. This research explores whether automated measurements from existing animal-mounted sensors can be used as a basis for objective welfare assessment in dairy cattle, supporting consumer, processor and farmer needs by demonstrating positive welfare on farm. Data (mean standing and lying duration, mean standing and lying bout frequency, mean standing and lying bout duration, mean maximum standing and lying bout duration, mean lying and standing bout frequency, mean step count) were acquired from commercially available ankle-mounted accelerometers intended for oestrus detection and compared to 20 QBA metrics from 107 animals at pasture and during housing on four dairy farms. Results: Our analysis showed that sensor data was significantly correlated with QBA data, suggesting that sensor data can be used to accurately characterise animal behaviour. Although sensor data was influenced by location (housed and pasture), data obtained from ankle-mounted pedometers showed high accuracy (61%) in predicting an animal's mood as positive or negative. In addition, step count and standing time were strongly correlated with positive behaviour QBA scores, suggesting that increased step count with decreased standing time may be an indicator of positive welfare. QBA results showed that animals at pasture displayed more positive behaviours, with 70.2% of pasture cattle exhibiting QBA scores associated with positive behaviours/mood, in comparison to 34.0% of housed cattle. Results also showed that skewedness of sensor data from cattle at pasture was an accurate indicator of behavioural synchrony (i.e. animals exhibiting the same behaviour at the same time), a known measure of positive welfare, although more granular time data is needed to investigate further. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of using automated animal-mounted sensor data to assess positive welfare in dairy cattle, with sensor-derived behavioural features enabling classification of mood states (positive or negative) in 61% of observations. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44363-025-00018-6.

Indexed as

Dairy cowPositive welfarePrecision livestock farmingQualitative Behaviour Assessment

Identifiers

PMID41283067
PMCPMC12637375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.