Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283066›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Applying Hybrid Coding and Reflexivity in Qualitative Content Analysis: An Exemplar.

Kunwar Kaur, Ma'en Zaid Abu-Qamar, Amineh Rashidi, Nilufeur McKay, Rosemary Saunders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Response to "Methodological Considerations on Coding Analysis and Sampling in a Study of ED Patient Expectations".Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kunwar KaurEdith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-7245
Ma'en Zaid Abu-QamarMutah University, Alkarak, Jordan.
Amineh RashidiUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Nilufeur McKayEdith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Rosemary SaundersEdith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) is a widely used method in nursing research for analysing textual data. Numerous authors have provided comprehensive explanations of this approach, including step-by-step guidelines. The coding methods employed in QCA are typically categorised as deductive, inductive, or a combination of both, often referred to as the abductive or hybrid technique. However, the hybrid coding technique remains under-utilised within nursing research. Further, trustworthiness, a cornerstone of qualitative research, has been extensively discussed in the literature, with reflexivity identified as a key component of ensuring rigor and credibility. This paper presents an example from nursing research where a hybrid coding technique was applied to analyse data. The authors also detail the reflexive practices adopted by the first author, who shared a close cultural relationship with the participants and data. These practices were critical in addressing potential biases and ensuring the trustworthiness of the research. Overall, this paper provides insights into the practical application of hybrid coding within the QCA framework, contributing to a deeper understanding of its utility in nursing research.

Indexed as

abductive codingcontent analysisdeductive reasoninghybrid codinginductive reasoningqualitative researchreflexivityresearch designtrustworthiness

Identifiers

PMID41283066
PMCPMC12638670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.