ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Development of machine learning models with explainable AI for frailty risk prediction and their web-based application in community public health.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond classification metrics: a psychometric-aware benchmark for data augmentation in imbalanced student mental health surveys.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Predictive Risk Models for Frailty Onset in Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Methodological Trends, Model Performance, and Clinical Translation Gap.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Identifying health risk profiles among older adults in Kerala using machine learning: multidimensional clustering, predictive determinants, and public health implications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Frailty is a public health concern linked to falls, disability, and mortality. Early screening and tailored interventions can mitigate adverse outcomes, but community settings require tools that are accurate and explainable. Korea is entering a super-aged phase, yet few approaches have used nationally representative survey data. Objective: This study aimed to identify key predictors of frailty risk using the K-FRAIL scale using explainable machine learning (ML), based on data from the 2023 National Survey of Older Koreans (NSOK). It also sought to develop and internally validate prediction models. To demonstrate the potential applicability of these models in community public health and clinical practice, a web-based application was implemented. Methods: Data from 10,078 older adults were analyzed, with frailty defined by the K-FRAIL scale (robust = 0, pre-frail = 1-2, and frail = 3-5). A total of 132 candidate variables were constructed through selection and derivation. Using CatBoost with out-of-fold (OOF) SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP, a game-theoretic approach to quantify feature contributions), 15 key predictors were identified and applied across 10 algorithms under nested cross-validation (CV). Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC), precision-recall area under the curve (PR-AUC), F1-score, balanced accuracy, and the Brier score. To assess feasibility, a single-page bilingual web application was developed, integrating the CatBoost inference pipeline for offline use. Results: SHAP analysis identified depression score, age, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) count, sleep quality, and cognition as the leading predictors, followed by smartphone use, number of medications, province, driving status, hospital use, physical activity, osteoporosis, eating alone, digital adaptation difficulty, and sex, yielding 15 key predictors across the mental, functional, lifestyle, social, and digital domains. Using these predictors, boosting models outperformed other algorithms, with CatBoost achieving the best performance (ROC-AUC = 0.813 ± 0.014; PR-AUC = 0.748 ± 0.019). Conclusion: An explainable machine learning model with strong discrimination performance and adequate calibration was developed, accompanied by a lightweight web application for potential use in community and clinical settings. However, external validation, recalibration, and subgroup fairness assessments are needed to ensure generalizability and clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.