Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283057›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Nip it in the bud: the role of vigilant leadership, knowledge sharing, and safety performance.

Qian Li, Song Lin Yang, Long Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian LiSchool of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Song Lin YangSchool of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Long YeSchool of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining vigilance is critical for High-speed railway (HSR) in a fickle environment of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. A new vigilant leadership style was introduced into HSR literature, which directs employees to focus on, search for, and respond to potential future threats. This study constructs a research model to examine the effect of vigilant leadership on safety performance from a social information processing perspective, with individual mindfulness as boundary condition and knowledge sharing as a mediator. We adopted a time-lagged study with 961 samples and 137 workgroups collected from Chinese Railway Bureau over 3 months. The findings state that vigilant leadership is associated with employees' safety performance by enhancing knowledge sharing. Employee's mindfulness moderates the indirect effect of vigilant leadership on safety performance through knowledge sharing. The indirect effect is more positive when an employee's mindfulness is high than when it is low. This research first introduces vigilant leadership to the Chinese HSR, which provides implications for raising the safety performance and long-term development of HSR organizations, and also benefits the HSR employees' occupational health and safety.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationLeadershipOccupational HealthRailroadsAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMindfulnesshigh-speed railwayindividual mindfulnessknowledge sharingoccupational health and safetysafety performancevigilant leadership

Identifiers

PMID41283057
PMCPMC12631308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.