ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Virtual sarcoma disease multidisciplinary team: a successful experience in the era of telemedicine and COVID-19 in Italy.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to their rarity and complexity sarcomas require specialized multidisciplinary team management. COVID-19 pandemic brought to a rapid implementation of telemedicine and activation of digital tools. This study evaluates the perception of virtual disease multidisciplinary team among healthcare professionals of an European rare cancer referral center. Methods: An online survey was administered to the participants of Regina Elena National Cancer Institute's Sarcoma disease multidisciplinary team meetings held between 2020 and 2022. It was composed of 40 questions comparing face-to-face and virtual meetings. Data from the Institutional disease multidisciplinary team from 2019 to 2022 were also analyzed retrospectively to compare the pre-covid, covid, and post-covid phases. Results: Twenty-two healthcare professionals answered the survey. In their opinion, decision-making process was not affected by virtual modality (86.0%). Regarding virtual meetings 90.0% were highly/moderately satisfied with depth of discussion, 95.0%-100% were able to interact adequately and access all relevant data. The most important improvements of virtual disease multidisciplinary team were better quality of clinical approach/research (22.7%-31.8%), technological innovations (50.0%), and logistical setting (95.5%). 90.0% to 100% thought that virtual disease multidisciplinary team could be approved thereafter. We observed an increase in participation rate from 58.0, to 62.0%, to 64.0% ( Conclusion: Virtual disease multidisciplinary team enhances participation and discussion quality without compromising patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.