Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283038›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Assessing urban community parks from an age-friendly perspective: a multi-criteria decision-making approach.

Weidan Dong, Shuai Sun, Yinghang Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weidan DongDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Dongshin University, Naju, Republic of Korea.
Shuai SunDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Dongshin University, Naju, Republic of Korea.
Yinghang FuDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Dongshin University, Naju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With the acceleration of population ageing, community parks have become vital spaces for older adults' daily activities. The age-friendliness of their spatial environment directly impacts the well-being of the older adult population. Scientifically evaluating the age-friendliness of community parks and proposing optimization strategies is crucial to promoting the physical and mental well-being of the older adults and enhancing the quality of urban public services. Methods: This study established an evaluation index system for the age-friendliness of community parks through field surveys, literature review, expert screening, and statistical validation. User perception data were collected via questionnaires, and a combination of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Entropy Weight Method was used to determine weights from both subjective and objective perspectives. Subsequently, the TOPSIS model was employed to conduct a comprehensive assessment of three typical community parks in Beijing. Results: The results indicate that path accessibility, ageing of leisure facilities, social space design, cultural, educational and recreational functions, and physical environment security are the most influential factors affecting the age-friendliness of community parks, with the highest weights. In contrast, intelligent service facilities, seasonal adaptability services, and community activities organization are relatively less prioritized by older adults. The findings reveal that the core needs of older adults in community park usage are centered on four key aspects: accessibility, recreation, social interaction, and safety. Furthermore, a comparative analysis revealed significant differences in overall age-friendliness across the three case parks, with Wanshou Park performing the best, Nanguan Park ranking second, and Shuangxiu Park ranking lowest. Discussion: Based on these findings, strategies to enhance the age-friendliness of community parks were proposed. This study provides both theoretical support and practical reference for the scientific assessment and optimization of community park age-friendliness, offering important insights for the adaptation of urban public spaces to an aging society.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEnvironment DesignParks, RecreationalResidence CharacteristicsUrban PopulationAgedBeijingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecreationSurveys and Questionnairesage-friendlyAHPcommunity parkentropy weight methodevaluation systemTOPSIS

Identifiers

PMID41283038
PMCPMC12634358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.