ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its control measures on women and children: a Zimbabwean case study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed significant health policy challenges, particularly for low-income countries, where policymakers faced both direct threats from the virus and social and economic harm owing to lockdown measures. We present a holistic contextualized case study of the direct and indirect impacts on women and children, highlighting disparities across socioeconomic, age, and gender groups. We utilized multiple data sources, including primary and secondary data from 28 in-depth interviews, six focus group discussions, and 40 household interviews, as well as data from government reports, District Health Information Software version 2 (DHIS2), and published research. A conceptual framework was devised to hypothesize causal pathways and guide the analysis of results. The findings indicate that the pandemic not only had direct effects, on morbidity and mortality, but also more severe indirect impacts, including job losses and limited access to healthcare, including maternal and child healthcare services, due to measures put in place to control it, which were exacerbated by well-known but inadequately considered preexisting political and economic challenges. The most severe indirect effects on healthcare services availability and wider livelihoods fell on the poorest segments of society, further widening the age and gender inequalities. Policymakers faced significant challenges in managing the direct and indirect harm of COVID-19, including short- and long-term effects and their unequal distribution across society. We conclude that the indirect effects of COVID-19 were at least as harmful, if not more so, than the direct impacts, especially for women and children. In the future, it is highly recommended to establish specific protocols and guidance for maternal and child health service access, including strategies that reduce barriers to social support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.