ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Untangling the role of social support in type 2 diabetes: insights from a mixed methods study in Quito, Ecuador.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) requires sustained behavioral changes to achieve glycemic control (GC) and prevent complications. Social support (SS) is key for self-care in chronic conditions, yet its impact on GC in low-resource settings remains understudied. This study explores the role of SS in T2DM management in a low-income community in Quito, Ecuador. Methods: We employed a mixed-methods approach with a parallel convergent design. A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 332 adults aged 25-88 years with T2DM, recruited from public health facilities in district D1706. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires, including the multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS); GC was assessed through clinical records. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between SS and GC, reporting crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. In parallel, 16 semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with T2DM and analyzed thematically using framework analysis. Results: Of the 332 participants, 263 had at least one glucose measurement and 28.6% achieved good GC. Those with better control reported slightly higher SS. While the overall SS score was not strongly associated with GC, the subscale of family support showed a positive association (adjusted OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.00-1.14 per MSPSS point). Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of emotional and instrumental family support, the perceived loss of friendship-based support, and the supportive role of community-based diabetes clubs. Discussion: The association between family support and glycemic control highlights the need to incorporate family dynamics into T2DM management strategies. However, expanding support networks beyond the family, such as through peer and community-based resources, may further enhance coping capacity and overall wellbeing. Interventions that integrate emotional, instrumental, and informational support from diverse sources could play a critical role in improving self-management and optimizing health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.