ArticlePeerJ2025
The effect of endoscopic polidocanol carbon dioxide foam for internal hemorrhoids: a retrospective study.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for Delayed Bleeding and Its Impact on Long-Term Efficacy After Endoscopic Sclerotherapy for Internal Haemorrhoids by Inverted Colonoscopy Without Transparent Caps.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This article aims to explore the effectiveness of polidocanol carbon dioxide foam as a therapy for internal hemorrhoids. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 158 patients who received endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids between October 2022 and September 2023. Among the patients, 78 underwent endoscopic polidocanol sclerotherapy with polidocanol air foam (control group), while 80 received polidocanol carbon dioxide foam (study group). The primary outcomes of this study were clinical effect and the incidence of complications 1 month after surgery. Patient self-reports of anal bleeding and anal prolapse served as the foundation for establishing three categories of clinical efficacy criteria. The clinical effect was determined based on the efficacy index, which was employed to assess treatment effectiveness. The occurrence of several postoperative complications was documented, specifically including anal pain, anal swelling, urinary retention, perianal infection, ectopic embolization, and anal edema. Secondary outcomes encompassed the surgical cost, duration of hospital stay, and the administered dosage of polidocanol. Result: The treatment success at the end of the sclerotherapy session in the study and control group were 85.0% and 83.3%, respectively ( Conclusion: The clinical effectiveness of endoscopic polidocanol carbon dioxide foam is on par with that of polidocanol air foam. In sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids, the use of endoscopic polidocanol carbon dioxide foam can significantly decrease complications such as anal swelling and pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.