ArticlePeerJ2025
Outcomes and safety of colonoscopy in elderly patients aged 80 years and older: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of colorectal tumors increases with age. Colonoscopy is crucial for early detection, yet performing it on patients aged 80 and older poses challenges due to their complex health conditions. Methods: This retrospective study included 447 elderly patients aged 80 years and older who underwent colorectal examinations at Peking University International Hospital from November 2015 to June 2024. Data on demographics, comorbidities, smoking and drinking history, and colonoscopy indications were collected. Risk factors for non-colorectal malignant tumors, colorectal malignant tumors, and colorectal advanced-stage tumors were compared. All patients received standard bowel preparation, and procedures were conducted by experienced endoscopists. Results: A total of 364 patients (81.4%) completed the procedure successfully. The main reasons for failure were inadequate intestinal preparation and intestinal stenosis. A total of 37 (8.3%) had no significant abnormalities, 315 (70.5%) were diagnosed with colorectal polyps, and 110 (24.6%) had malignant tumors. The complication rate was 0.67%. Univariate analysis showed that patients with colorectal malignant tumors were older ( Discussion: Age is a significant risk factor for colorectal malignancies and advanced tumors. Although colonoscopy in elderly patients has acceptable safety, they face challenges in bowel preparation and examination techniques. The incidence of polyps and malignant tumors in this population is high. However, the study has limitations, such as its retrospective nature and reliance on incomplete electronic medical records. Conclusion: Colonoscopy is effective and safe for elderly patients aged 80 and older. It is essential for detecting colorectal malignancies and polyps. Age-related risk factors highlight the importance of this procedure in this high-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.