ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Rare and Common Genomic Copy Number Variants Associated with Strabismus and Amblyopia in the All of Us Research Program.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify rare and common CNVs associated with strabismus and amblyopia and to determine whether these variants reveal overlapping genetic mechanisms between the two disorders. Design: Case-control association study using structural variant calls from short-read whole- genome sequencing. Subject participants and controls: 1,141 adults with strabismus, 566 with amblyopia (157 with both), and controls (95,806 for strabismus; 96,381 for amblyopia) enrolled in the Methods: CNVs were called using the GATK-SV pipeline from short-read whole genome sequencing (srWGS). After instituting a variety of quality control measures, including requiring two types of evidence and being identified by two different calling algorithms, CNVs present in 20 or more affected individuals were divided into rare (<1% population frequency) and common (>1% population frequency). The rates of each CNV were compared between affected individuals and controls. Significant CNVs were manually verified in IGV. Functional effects were annotated using Varient Effect Predictor from Ensembl. Main Outcome Measures: Odds ratios for CNV carrier status in cases versus controls, adjusted for multiple testing (Benjamini-Hochberg FDR < 0.05); functional annotation, dosage sensitivity, regulatory element overlap, and pathway enrichment. Results: Fourteen rare and 29 common CNVs were significantly associated with strabismus; 1 rare and 2 common CNVs were associated with amblyopia (45 unique CNVs total). The rare CNV associated with amblyopia is an intronic deletion in Conclusions: CNVs highlight synaptic and neurodevelopmental pathways as central to strabismus and amblyopia etiology and provide the first evidence of shared genetic risk. The combination of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.