ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
PERFORMANCE OF FUJILAM VERSION 1 FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS IN CHILDREN UNDER 5 YEARS IN UGANDA - A BRIEF REPORT.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing tuberculosis in children remains challenging due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease, non-specific symptoms, and difficulty collecting samples. New tests are urgently needed. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FujiLAM version 1 urine test in children under 5 years with presumptive tuberculosis in Uganda. Methods: This was a cross-sectional evaluation nested in the NOD-pedFEND diagnostic study. Children under 5 years with signs or symptoms of tuberculosis were recruited from three hospitals in Uganda. All participants underwent comprehensive baseline investigations, including culture and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on reference samples and chest X-ray. Culture and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra results were used to define a microbiological reference standard. FujiLAM version 1 testing was performed on fresh urine at the baseline visit. Results: Seventy-nine children were included in the study. Fifteen participants (19%) were classified as having microbiologically confirmed TB, 44 (56%) as unconfirmed TB, thirteen (16%) as unlikely TB, and seven participants (9%) were unclassifiable. Only one participant (with unlikely TB) had a positive FujiLAM test. Culture and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra on reference samples were negative in this child, indicating poor diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 0% (95% CI: 0 - 21.8) of FujiLAM version 1 against the microbiological reference standard. Conclusion: The poor diagnostic accuracy of FujiLAM version 1 in children under five years of age makes it unsuitable as a diagnostic test in this age group. Further evaluation with the optimized version 2 of this test is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.