ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Virtual Neuronavigation for Parcel-guided TMS.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: rTMS for depression is partially effective which is likely in part due to the treatment coil positioning being based on scalp-based approaches. Such an approach results in not accounting for Methods: We sought to develop a virtual neuronavigation system in which MRI images are processed on the backend to determine p46 and a corresponding individualized 3D printed scalp headgear is developed. The headgear includes markings for the location corresponding to p46 and other anatomical guides. Headgear development involved an iterative sequence of 3D CAD modeling, printing, and testing to meet the gold standard neuronavigation-guided location. Individual headgear accuracy is then verified by positioning on the intended subject and comparing alignment with the location on the scalp and brain intersecting the neuronavigation beam targeting p46. Reproducibility testing was also performed. Results: Across 16 test subjects on which the final version of the headgear could be tested, individualized headgear was found to be 8.31± 4.93 mm from the neuronavigation-determined scalp location. The corresponding distances on the brain was 7.94± 4.99 mm. Within-subject reproducibility (against centroid formed by 3 measurements) was 1.21 ± 0.84 mm across n= 8 subjects. Conclusion: Individualized headgear targeting presents a viable option for practices to leverage state-of-the-art targeting advances without investing in neuronavigation hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.