ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Differentiating Mpox Infection and Vaccination Using a Validated Multiplex Orthopoxvirus IgG Serology Assay.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The resurgence of monkeypox virus (MPXV) outbreaks has increased demand for validated serological assays to assess exposure and immunity. Cross-reactivity among orthopoxivuses, stemming from high sequence conservation, complicates distinguishing antibody responses from natural MPXV infection versus vaccination or other orthopoxvirus exposures. We validated the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) V-PLEX Orthopoxvirus Panel 1 (IgG) Kit, which quantifies antibody levels to five MPXV antigens and their vaccina virus (VACV) orthologs, following Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) guidelines. We assessed assay performance using serum from 26 individuals with prior mpox, 52 JYNNEOS vaccine recipients, and 179 unexposed controls. The assay reliably detected antibody responses in all exposed cohorts with peak levels observed 2-months post-vaccination. Antibody levels to specific antigens also correlated with Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) neutralization titer, particularly for MPXV B6R/VACV B5R, MPXV E8L/VACV D8L, and MPXV M1R/VACV L1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that some individual antigens achieved high sensitivity and specificity for exposure detection (AUC > 0.96 for VACV D8L, MPXV B6R, VACV B5R); however, individual antigens performed poorly in distinguishing infection from vaccination. In contrast, antibody level ratios between some MPXV and VACV orthologs effectively differentiated MPXV infection from vaccinia vaccination with high sensitivity and specificity (e.g. MPXV A35R/VACV A33R ortholog ratio, AUC = 0.97, sensitivity = 0.97, specificity = 0.96). Our findings validate the MSD assay for clinical research and serosurveillance to assess MPXV immunity and support the utility of ortholog pair ratio analysis as a strategy to discriminate vaccinated and infected individuals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.