ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Experience in the adoption of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) as a tool for medical research in Tanzania.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To document the deployment and training of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) at Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) in Tanzania and to evaluate user satisfaction and perceived impact on research practices in Tanzania. Materials and Methods: Six structured REDCap training workshops were conducted between 2016 and 2022. The post-training evaluation surveys were completed by 110 participants. Descriptive statistics were generated for demographics and cadres, while Likert-scale responses assessed satisfaction and perceived utility. Diverging stacked bar charts were used to visualize attitudes toward adopting REDCap. Results: Most trainees were male (62.7%), aged 26-32 years (52.7%), and affiliated with MUHAS (66.4%), with additional representation from Ghana and Nigeria. The participants included academic or research staff (41.8%), postgraduate students (28.2%), undergraduate students (11.8%), and other professionals (18.2%). Post-training evaluations indicated consistently high satisfaction, with mean scores above 4.4 on a 5-point scale. Trainees strongly endorsed REDCap's ability to enhance research effectiveness (mean 4.53, SD 0.65), increase productivity (mean 4.52, SD 0.69), and improve task completion (mean 4.50, SD 0.68). More than 85% of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the positive statements, underscoring the broad acceptance of REDCap as a reliable tool for research data management. Discussion: The findings underscore the importance of structured training in mitigating barriers to adoption and enhancing data quality, efficiency, and institutional visibility. Conclusion: Structured REDCap training in Tanzania was associated with high user satisfaction and perceived improvements in research productivity and data quality, offering a scalable model for strengthening data management capacity in sub-Saharan Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.