ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Predicting Behavioral Determinants of Health from Clinical Text Using Transformer Models and BiLSTM.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Social and behavioral determinants of health play a critical role in patient outcomes, yet much of this information is documented only in unstructured clinical text rather than structured records. Detecting these factors using natural language processing enables a deeper understanding of patient health and supports better decision-making. This study aims to improve the prediction of Behavioral Determinants of Health (BDoH) from medical records by systematically comparing multiple transformer-based models: Bio-ClinicalBERT, BioBERT, BioMedBERT, RoBERTa, and T5-EHR with and without BiLSTM. We also address the challenge of class imbalance in the dataset and assess the role of generative versus discriminative models in this task. Methods: We evaluated five transformer models in combination with BiLSTM for classifying BDoH mentions in the MIMIC-III dataset. To address the challenge of class imbalance, we compared oversampling, undersampling, and class weighting strategies to identify the most effective approach. Then, each model was first tested as a standalone classifier to establish baseline performance. We then extracted embeddings from these models and used them as input to a BiLSTM layer to investigate whether sequential modeling could further improve classification. Also, by introducing our T5-EHR model alongside BERT and RoBERTa models, we were able to assess both the benefits of BiLSTM and the value of using a generative model for this task. Finally, we benchmarked the performance of the best approaches against the published results from the MIMIC-SBDH study, using precision, recall, and F1 scores as evaluation metrics. Results: The experiments showed that class weighting was the most effective strategy for handling class imbalance, showing better performance across all models. The addition of BiLSTM improved the performance of Bio-ClinicalBERT, BioMedBERT, and BioBERT across all categories. RoBERTa and T5-EHR achieved strong results as standalone models, with no additional benefit from BiLSTM integration. Across all evaluated labels, T5-EHR achieved the highest F1 scores compared to the other models and prior baselines in this study. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that handling class imbalance is essential for robust prediction of social and behavioral determinants of health from clinical notes. We find that the integration of BiLSTM provides clear benefits for Bio-ClinicalBERT and BioBERT, enhancing their ability to capture sequential dependencies. However, RoBERTa and T5-EHR achieved their best performance without BiLSTM, reflecting the strength of their pretrained representations. Among all models, our pretrained T5-EHR, adapted especially for clinical text, outperformed every baseline, establishing the highest F1 scores across all labels and surpassing the results reported in the MIMIC-SBDH benchmark. These findings highlight both the value of model-specific strategies and the effectiveness of generative models for advancing state-of-the-art classification in health informatics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.