ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Plasma proteomic signatures of preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and memory in clinically unimpaired older adults.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Multianalyte plasma proteomic panels that can accurately detect initial AD pathology in preclinical populations and simultaneously measure related biological processes relevant for disease risk are critical for advancing early detection and prognosis. Methods: Using the NULISAseq CNS panel, we measured plasma from 193 clinically unimpaired (CU) older adults enrolled in the Stanford Aging and Memory Study (SAMS). We evaluated correspondence of core AD-relevant biomarkers Aβ42, Aβ40, pTau217, pTau181, GFAP, NfL, Aβ42/Aβ40, and pTau217/Aβ42 measured using NULISAseq and established Lumipulse immunoassays. ROC curve analyses compared the accuracy of these biomarkers for detecting Lumipulse CSF Aβ-positivity across platforms. Linear models were applied across 124 NULISAseq proteins to examine associations with common AD risk factors, including age, female sex, and Results: Moderate to high correlations were observed between NULISAseq and Lumipulse AD plasma biomarkers. Across platforms, plasma pTau217/Aβ42 exhibited the highest performance in discriminating CSF A+ (NULISAseq AUC: 0.940, 95%CI: 0.885-0.995; Lumipulse AUC: 0.907, 95%CI: 0.849-0.966). Age and sex were associated with differential expression of NULISAseq targets linked to neurodegeneration, microglial activation, and inflammation. CSF A+ was associated with fold change differences in Aβ42, pTau217, pTau231, pTau181, and GFAP, while CSF T+ was additionally associated with increases in TREM1, TIMP3, SAA1, and S100A12. When stratified by AT groups, A+T- exhibited lower Aβ42 and elevated pTau217 compared to A-T-, whereas A+T+ exhibited elevated pTau231 and pTau181 compared to A+T-. Temporal cortex tau was positively associated with NULISAseq pTau217, pTau231, pTau181, and pTau217/Aβ42. Memory function was negatively associated with pTau isoforms and PRDX6, YWHAZ, ENO2, ARSA, CHI3L1, CXCL8, and FCN2. These associations remained when controlling for pTau217 and restricting to A- CU, suggesting these targets may represent AD-independent biological pathways relevant for memory function. Conclusions: NULISAseq immunoassay-based multiplexing accurately detects AD pathology among CU older adults and identifies multiple biological pathways related to early biomarker abnormality and memory function that may become dysregulated in preclinical AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.