ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Predicting Future Brain Atrophy Based on Longitudinal MRI.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuron loss is a key feature of neurodegenerative diseases often leading to brain atrophy detectable through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Various brain atrophy measures are essential in research of Alzheimer' disease (AD) and related dementias. This study aims to forecast future annual percentage changes in hippocampal, ventricular, and total gray matter (TGM) volumes in individuals with varying cognitive statuses, from healthy to dementia. We developed a machine learning model using elastic net linear regression and tested two approaches: (1) a baseline model using predictors from a single-time-point and (2) a longitudinal model using predictors derived from longitudinal MRI. Both approaches were evaluated with MRI-only models and models that combined MRI with additional risk factors (age, sex, APOE4, and baseline diagnosis). Cross-validated Pearson correlation scores between predicted and actual annual percentage changes were 0.62 for the hippocampus, 0.51 for the ventricles, and 0.41 for TGM, using the longitudinal MRI + risk factor model. Longitudinal models consistently outperformed baseline models, and models including risk factors outperformed the MRI only model. Validation using an external dataset confirmed these findings, highlighting the value of predictors derived based on longitudinal data. We further studied the value of the predicted atrophy/enlargement rates for clinical status progression prediction across three different datasets. Predicted atrophy was a consistently better indicator of progression to mild cognitive impairment and dementia than present-day regional volumes, with the longitudinal atrophy prediction model typically outperforming the baseline model in terms of clinical status prediction. Future atrophy prediction has significant potential for assessing the risk of cognitive decline, even in cognitively unimpaired individuals, and can aid in selecting participants for clinical trials of disease-modifying drugs for AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.