ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
A Flexible and Responsive Remote Study Design to Assess Gene Expression Changes During Wildfire Smoke Exposure with homeRNA, an At-home Blood Sampling Kit.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptomic responses to wildfire smoke are difficult to study given the unpredictability of wildfires and the challenges of collecting blood during active disasters. To overcome these challenges, we developed a flexible study design leveraging homeRNA, our at-home blood collection and RNA stabilization kit. Between June 2021 and April 2022, 58 participants across 10 U.S. states collected 635 blood samples before, during, and after wildfire events. This responsive approach captured three exposure groups: high exposure in Okanogan County, Washington, medium exposure from transported smoke, and low exposure. During the 10-month study, 93% of participants (n=54/58) returned at least 6 samples. In a preliminary exploratory analysis, we analyzed 770 genes with a Nanostring panel from nine participants (6 high, 3 low-medium exposure) using the BloodGen3 framework. In the high exposure participants, we observed trends toward overexpression of inflammation (inflammation aggregates A33 and A35, and modules M13.1 and M13.12), with concurrent underexpression of adaptive immune responses (lymphocytic aggregates A1 and A6, B cell module M13.18, T cell modules M16.24 and M15.38). This study establishes that homeRNA enables flexible, responsive sampling during disasters, overcoming traditional logistical barriers to capture time-sensitive biological data across dispersed populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.