ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
A Generative Patient Digital Twin for Sequential Treatment of Oropharyngeal Squamous Carcinomas.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-world testing of treatment strategies is often infeasible, emphasizing the need for robust simulation frameworks that can model diverse patient characteristics and predict treatment outcomes. In this study, we present a generative simulator designed to synthesize patient profiles and forecast treatment results under hypothetical scenarios,with the goal of facilitating personalized treatment planning with what-if scenarios. The proposed simulator is able to predict disease progression and treatment outcomes based on synthesized profiles through application of Variational Autoencoder and XGBoost models. Simulations evaluated its ability of generating realistic baseline patient profiles, and the predictive accuracy of the combined framework. The proposed method outperformed rule-based approaches and multilayer perceptron models in predicting 22 out of 25 clinical variables, with performance measured by F1 scores for categorical variables and Mean Squared Error for numerical variables. Case studies of two patients drawn from ground truth data illustrate that the simulator framework can represent both short treatment courses with early relapse and prolonged multi-modal trajectories with recurrent disease. These results underscore the framework's ability to capture complex relationships in clinical data and highlight its advantages over baseline methods. Although this work focuses on validating the simulator's generative and predictive capabilities, it establishes a foundation for future research in personalized treatment planning, including what-if analyses and reinforcement learning studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.