Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282828›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

The ENGAGE Study: A Randomized Trial Optimizing Uptake of Germline Cancer Genetic Services in Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Tara O Henderson, Brian Egleston, Sarah Howe, Mary Ashley Allen, Rajia Mim, Linda G Fleisher, Elena B Elkin, Kevin C Oeffinger, Kevin R Krull, Demetrios Ofidis and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04455698 (Engaging and Activating Cancer Survivors in Genetic Services Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04455698 nacompletednot on this map

Engaging and Activating Cancer Survivors in Genetic Services Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2021 to 2025Enrolled511ConditionsCancerArmsRemote Telegenetic Counseling by Phone, Remote Telegenetic Counseling by Videoconferencing, Usual Care Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Tara O Henderson
Brian Egleston
Sarah Howe
Mary Ashley Allen
Rajia Mim
Linda G Fleisher
Elena B Elkin
Kevin C Oeffinger
Kevin R Krull
Demetrios Ofidis
Briana Mcleod
Hannah Griffin
Elisabeth M Wood
Cara N Cacioppo
Sarah Brown
Melody Perpich
Gregory T Armstrong
Angela R Bradbury

Funding

Mach-LETSGO: Machine-LEarning of Treatment, Survey, and Genetics towards Obtaining Correct Classification of Chronic Conditions in Adult Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - CCSS SupplU24CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1999 to 2026
$96.7M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA055727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying childhood cancer survivors who are already at high risk of subsequent neoplasms and may also have an inherited genetic susceptibility is essential for effective surveillance and prevention. This trial evaluated the effectiveness of remote, centralized telehealth genetic services in increasing service uptake. Methods: Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) participants at the St. Jude Research Hospital, who were > 18 years old and survivors of a CNS tumor, sarcoma, or more than one primary cancer, were recruited for the study. After completing a baseline survey, participants were randomly assigned to one of three arms: remote telehealth genetic services via phone, videoconference, or usual care. Uptake of genetic services was obtained through study records and the six-month Status Survey. Findings: Of the 391 participants recruited, 262 were assigned to remote telehealth services (via phone or videoconference) and 129 to usual care. At six months, 43% (113/262) of participants in remote telehealth services received genetic services compared to 15% (19/129) in the usual care group (OR = 4·4, 95% CI 2·5-8·0, p<0·0001). Uptake of genetic counseling (42% vs. 15%, p < 0·0001) and genetic testing (19% vs. 9%, p = 0·020) were higher in remote telehealth services. Factors associated with higher uptake included not having high-deductible health insurance (OR = 1·67, 95%CI 1·00-2·91, p = 0·049) and lower perceived cost of testing (OR = 1·51, 95%CI 1·17-1·96, p = 0·0014). Top barriers included experiencing higher levels of depression (OR=0·91, 95%CI 0·85-0·98, p = 0·0067) and anxiety (OR=0·93, 95%CI 0·87-1·00, p = 0·036). Interpretation: Remote telehealth genetic services improve genetic counseling and testing uptake in childhood cancer. Addressing remaining barriers could maximize their impact and ensure equitable access for childhood cancer survivors and their families. Funding: National Cancer Institute (R01-CA237369, U24-CA55727). Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04455698 at http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

Identifiers

PMID41282828
PMCPMC12633570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.