ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Knowledge, perceptions and acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine in Plateau States, Nigeria: A Qualitative Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Knowledge, perceptions, and acceptance of vaccines play a role in evaluating the progress of past immunization programs and planning for future pandemics. The study assessed the knowledge, perceptions, and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant women, HCWs, and policymakers in Nigeria and identified the barriers and enablers to the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines and future ones. Methods: The study adopted qualitative methods of qualitative collection, comprising focus group discussion (FGD) with pregnant women- who were HIV positive and negative- and key informant interviews (KII) with healthcare workers (HCWs) and policymakers in Plateau State, Nigeria. The sample comprised forty pregnant women, five HCWs and five policymakers. Data was managed using Dedoose (version 9.0) and analyzed thematically. Results: Although all sub-groups acknowledged the importance of vaccination, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was identified amongst a significant proportion of pregnant women. This was because of safety concerns, misinformation and fear of side effects. HCWs were identified as key influencers of vaccine acceptance during pregnancy. Also, family and friends, personal beliefs, and awareness were found to be influencers of vaccination, while religious and cultural beliefs were identified as barriers. Policymakers and HCWs believe that there is a need for education and awareness to address misinformation and improve the trust in vaccine safety and the health system among pregnant women. Conclusion: The participants were knowledgeable of vaccines. However, pregnant women expressed skepticism about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. Thus, addressing misinformation through public health awareness programs is important while leveraging the influence of the health workforce, community, and religious leaders in promoting vaccine acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.