ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Remote, self-administered, smartphone cognitive testing in a registry-based cohort: Feasibility, reliability, and validity findings.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Remote, smartphone-based cognitive testing may improve access to cognitive assessments for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. We evaluated the feasibility, reliability, and validity of unsupervised smartphone-based cognitive tests in a registry-based cohort. Methods: Adults without a record of cognitive impairment (N=1,815; ages 18-92) were recruited from the UCSF Brain Health Registry to complete unsupervised ALLFTD-mApp cognitive tasks three times over two weeks. Reliability was assessed with correlations between sessions. Linear regression models tested associations of ALLFTD-mApp tasks with demographics, self- and informant-rated cognitive concerns (Everyday Cognition Surveys; ECog), and web-based cognitive testing (CogState Brief Battery; CBB). Results: Adherence was high (82.2%) and usability favorable. Test-retest reliability was moderate to strong ( Conclusion: Findings support the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the ALLFTD-mApp in adults without a record of cognitive impairment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.