Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282758›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Changes in Aortic Centerline Length and Curvature Predict Aortic Diameter Growth in Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection.

Xue Liang, Hai Dong, Marc-Philipp H Schmid, Minliang Liu, Hannah L Cebull, Michael Zhang, Sunny Xu, Muhammad Naeem, John N Oshinski, John A Elefteriades and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xue Liang
Hai Dong
Marc-Philipp H Schmid
Minliang Liu
Hannah L Cebull
Michael Zhang
Sunny Xu
Muhammad Naeem
John N Oshinski
John A Elefteriades
Rudolph L Gleason
Bradley G LeshnowerORCID 0000-0002-2290-1729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Aortic diameter is the primary metric used to trigger surgical intervention in chronic Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) This study investigates the correlation between diameter growth and changes in aortic centerline length, curvature and aortic volume in chronic TBAD. Methods: We retrospectively collected 80 computed tomography (CT) images from 31 chronic TBAD patients. Eighteen patients had three follow-up CT images (CT-1, CT-2, and CT-3), while the remaining 13 had two scans (CT-1 and CT-2). Three-dimensional geometry and aortic centerlines were reconstructed from each CT scan, based on which the mean and maximum TBAD diameter were obtained. The centerline length (CL) and curvature (CC) from the left subclavian to celiac branch were also obtained. The relationship between the diameter growth rate vs. CL/CC growth rate were investigated using linear regression analysis. Results: Between CT-1 & CT-2, the CL growth rate had an inverse correlation with the mean ( Conclusions: In chronic TBAD, the CL/CC growth has an inverse relationship with aortic diameter growth, which may be used to predict diameter of chronic TBAD. Central Picture: Central Message: In chronic Type B Aortic Dissection (TBAD), the growth of centerline length and curvature has an inverse correlation with the diameter growth, which may be used to predict chronic TBAD diameter. Perspective Statement: This study investigates the correlation between diameter growth and changes in aortic centerline length (CL) and curvature (CC) in chronic TBAD. Based upon our findings, the CL/CC growth has an inverse correlation with the diameter growth, and early CL/CC growth predicted later diameter growth more strongly than did early diameter growth itself.

Identifiers

PMID41282758
PMCPMC12633111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.