ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Clinical Relevance of Computationally Derived Attributes of Arteries and Arterioles in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The current semi-qualitative methods used to score sclerosis and hyalinosis in arteries and arterioles in clinical practice are limited in standardization and reproducibility. We developed a computational pipeline designed to accurately and consistently quantify prognostic arterial and arteriolar characteristics in digital kidney biopsies of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and minimal change disease (MCD) through segmentation and pathomic feature extraction. Methods: We utilized one trichrome-stained WSI from 225 participants in the NEPTUNE/CureGN studies, comprising 127 cases of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and 98 cases of minimal change disease (MCD). We developed, validated, and quality-controlled deep learning models to segment muscular vessels and their internal compartments (lumen, intima, media, and hyalinosis), including (i) arcuate arteries, (ii) interlobular arteries, and (iii) arterioles with two muscle layers. Arterioles, interlobular, and arcuate arteries were visually scored for sclerosis and hyalinosis on a scale of 0 to 3. Area- and thickness-based pathomic feature extraction was performed on each compartment (lumen, intima, media, and hyalinosis) through radial sampling and ray casting. A correlation study was performed between pathomic and visual semiquantitative visual scores, and the association of both visual scores and pathomic features with disease progression (40% eGFR decline or renal failure) was assessed. Summary statistics (maximum, median, and 75th percentile) were computed for each WSI and analyzed using LASSO-regularized Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for clinical and demographic factors. Results: A total of 1,499 arterioles, 686 interlobular arteries, and 131 arcuate arteries were segmented. Statistically significant correlations were found between pathologists visual scores and the average intima-media thickness ratio (Spearman ρ = 0.27, p < 0.001 for arterioles; ρ = 0.69, p < 0.001 for interlobular arteries; and ρ = 0.80, p < 0.001 for arcuate arteries) and arteriolar hyalinosis (ρ = 0.46, p < 0.001). Incorporating pathomic features from trichrome-stained WSIs improved the prediction of disease progression, enhancing the concordance index from 0.70 to 0.75 in arterioles and from 0.69 to 0.74 in arcuate arteries, compared to using demographics and clinical characteristics alone. Conclusion: Our computational approach offers a novel and reliable method for segmenting and analyzing the pathomic features of sclerosis and hylalinosis in arteries and arterioles. This technique has demonstrated potential as a valuable tool for enhancing the clinical assessment performed by pathologists.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.