ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Sleep Health Behind Bars: A Global Scoping Review of Sleep in Carceral Settings.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Sleep is a fundamental determinant of health, yet little is known about sleep in carceral environments where structural, environmental, and psychosocial factors uniquely disrupt rest. Incarcerated individuals face disproportionately high burdens of illness, with sleep disturbances contributing to these disparities. Understanding the evidence on sleep in incarceration is essential for informing care, policy, and research. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature on sleep in incarcerated populations, following the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Ten databases were searched from inception to March 2025 for studies addressing sleep among currently incarcerated individuals. Two reviewers screened and extracted data, with quality appraisal adapted from Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results: Of 5,518 records identified, 63 studies published between 1978 and 2025 met inclusion criteria. Most were observational (75%), cross-sectional (59%), and published after 2014, with studies conducted mostly outside the United States. Research clustered into three domains: (1) descriptions of sleep quality and insomnia; (2) sleep and health outcomes, particularly depression, anxiety, PTSD, aggression, and suicidality, with limited study of cardiometabolic risk; and (3) interventions including cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, mindfulness, yoga, and relaxation, which showed feasibility but were limited by small samples, lack of controls, or short follow-up. Objective measures were rarely used. Conclusions: Evidence demonstrates compromised sleep health in carceral settings due to psychiatric comorbidity, environmental stressors, and restricted care. Gaps remain in physical health outcomes, women's experiences, and post-release effects. Interventions tailored to carceral realities and adapted evidence-based interventions showed promise.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.