ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Quantifying intra-individual variability in anatomical sites of pain in longitudinal studies.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Longitudinal pain studies present an opportunity to understand intra-individual variations in pain. However, current methods to quantify the anatomical extent of pain fail to capture variations across multiple body sites over time. Our aims were to (1) describe patterns of intra-individual variation in pain sites over time, (2) develop a metric that quantifies intra-individual variation in pain sites over time, and (3) determine whether this metric is related to other indicators of pain burden. We used data from a longitudinal cohort of 72 participants (51 female; median (IQR) age 43 (37-51) years) living with virally suppressed HIV, who provided weekly reports of pain severity, pain site(s), and distress over 49 weeks. Participant reports showed noteworthy intra-individual changes in pain sites over time. The pain sites variation metric, based on 727 consecutive reports from 53 participants, reflected intra-individual temporal variation in pain sites, and distinguished participants with consistent pain sites from participants with high temporal variation in pain sites. The metric was positively associated with pain severity and emotional distress, but only when unadjusted for the count of painful sites. Thus, using a longitudinal cohort, we developed a metric that quantifies individual temporal variability in pain sites and demonstrated its relationship to two frequently used metrics of pain burden, namely pain severity and distress. This metric provides an opportunity to study whether the number of, and variability in, pain sites contributes to pain burden and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.