Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282694›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Infectious disease modeling for public health practice: projections, scenarios, and uncertainty in three phases of outbreak response.

Andrew F Brouwer, Marisa C Eisenberg, Natalie E Dean, Harry Hochheiser, Philip Huang, Joseph R Coyle, Lior Rennert

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew F BrouwerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-3779-5287
Marisa C EisenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0003-4221-830X
Natalie E DeanDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0003-3884-0921
Harry HochheiserDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-9982
Philip HuangDallas County Health and Human Services, Dallas, TX.
Joseph R CoyleMichigan Public Health Integrated Center for Outbreak Analytics and Modeling, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Lior RennertDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.ORCID 0000-0001-5275-7273

Funding

Developing a dynamic modeling framework for surveillance, prediction, and real-time resource allocation to reduce health disparities during Covid-19 and future pandemicsR01LM014193 · NLM · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI Lior Rennert · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health departments need evidence-backed projections and scenarios to support decision making in infectious disease outbreaks. However, traditional infectious disease models are often not readily deployable or responsive to the urgent questions and priorities of public health departments or health systems. Moreover, uncertainty in model outputs is frequently misrepresented, undermining trust among public health practitioners and the public. To address these issues, we, the Insight Net Modeling Guidance for Public Health Working Group, used early COVID-19 data from Michigan to illustrate practical and responsive modeling approaches to answer urgent questions in each of three key phases of response to an emerging outbreak: prior to local introduction, early exponential growth, and established transmission with potential interventions. In each phase, we integrate case, hospitalization, and death data and capture ranges of plausible future trajectories. These models, which produce status quo and scenario projections, are intended to inform planning and motivate action rather than forecast precise future outcomes. Importantly, this work offers guidance to focus modeling efforts and provides clear, reproducible examples for how to fit and implement these models, ultimately serving as both a conceptual guide and practical toolkit to support more transparent, timely, and appropriate use of models in outbreak response.

Identifiers

PMID41282694
PMCPMC12633609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.